[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _reference/testing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
Testing Odoo
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are many ways to test an application. In Odoo, we have three kinds of
|
|
|
|
tests
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
- Python unit tests (see `Testing Python code`_): useful for testing model business logic
|
|
|
|
- JS unit tests (see `Testing JS code`_): useful to test the javascript code in isolation
|
|
|
|
- Tours (see `Integration Testing`_): tours simulate a real situation. They ensures that the
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
python and the javascript parts properly talk to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Python code
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odoo provides support for testing modules using unittest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To write tests, simply define a ``tests`` sub-package in your module, it will
|
|
|
|
be automatically inspected for test modules. Test modules should have a name
|
|
|
|
starting with ``test_`` and should be imported from ``tests/__init__.py``,
|
|
|
|
e.g.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your_module
|
|
|
|
|-- ...
|
|
|
|
`-- tests
|
|
|
|
|-- __init__.py
|
|
|
|
|-- test_bar.py
|
|
|
|
`-- test_foo.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and ``__init__.py`` contains::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from . import test_foo, test_bar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test modules which are not imported from ``tests/__init__.py`` will not be
|
|
|
|
run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The test runner will simply run any test case, as described in the official
|
|
|
|
`unittest documentation`_, but Odoo provides a number of utilities and helpers
|
|
|
|
related to testing Odoo content (modules, mainly):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.TransactionCase
|
|
|
|
:members: browse_ref, ref
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.SingleTransactionCase
|
|
|
|
:members: browse_ref, ref
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.SavepointCase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.HttpCase
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
:members: browse_ref, ref, url_open, browser_js
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autofunction:: odoo.tests.common.tagged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, tests are run once right after the corresponding module has been
|
|
|
|
installed. Test cases can also be configured to run after all modules have
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
been installed, and not run right after the module installation::
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
# coding: utf-8
|
|
|
|
from odoo.tests import HttpCase, tagged
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
# This test should only be executed after all modules have been installed.
|
|
|
|
@tagged('-at_install', 'post_install')
|
|
|
|
class WebsiteVisitorTests(HttpCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_create_visitor_on_tracked_page(self):
|
|
|
|
Page = self.env['website.page']
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most common situation is to use
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.TransactionCase` and test a property of a model
|
|
|
|
in each method::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestModelA(common.TransactionCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_some_action(self):
|
|
|
|
record = self.env['model.a'].create({'field': 'value'})
|
|
|
|
record.some_action()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
record.field,
|
|
|
|
expected_field_value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# other tests...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test methods must start with ``test_``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.Form
|
|
|
|
:members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.M2MProxy
|
|
|
|
:members: add, remove, clear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoclass:: odoo.tests.common.O2MProxy
|
|
|
|
:members: new, edit, remove
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running tests
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tests are automatically run when installing or updating modules if
|
|
|
|
:option:`--test-enable <odoo-bin --test-enable>` was enabled when starting the
|
|
|
|
Odoo server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _unittest documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-12 16:53:22 +07:00
|
|
|
.. _developer/reference/testing/selection:
|
|
|
|
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
Test selection
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Odoo, Python tests can be tagged to facilitate the test selection when
|
|
|
|
running tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subclasses of :class:`odoo.tests.common.BaseCase` (usually through
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.TransactionCase`,
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.SavepointCase` or
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.HttpCase`) are automatically tagged with
|
|
|
|
``standard``, ``at_install`` and their source module's name by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invocation
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:option:`--test-tags <odoo-bin --test-tags>` can be used to select/filter tests
|
|
|
|
to run on the command-line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This option defaults to ``+standard`` meaning tests tagged ``standard``
|
|
|
|
(explicitly or implicitly) will be run by default when starting Odoo
|
|
|
|
with :option:`--test-enable <odoo-bin --test-enable>`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When writing tests, the :func:`~odoo.tests.common.tagged` decorator can be
|
|
|
|
used on **test classes** to add or remove tags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decorator's arguments are tag names, as strings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. danger:: :func:`~odoo.tests.common.tagged` is a class decorator, it has no
|
|
|
|
effect on functions or methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags can be prefixed with the minus (``-``) sign, to *remove* them instead of
|
|
|
|
add or select them e.g. if you don't want your test to be executed by
|
|
|
|
default you can remove the ``standard`` tag:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from odoo.tests import TransactionCase, tagged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@tagged('-standard', 'nice')
|
|
|
|
class NiceTest(TransactionCase):
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test will not be selected by default, to run it the relevant tag will
|
|
|
|
have to be selected explicitely:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that only the tests tagged ``nice`` are going to be executed. To run
|
|
|
|
*both* ``nice`` and ``standard`` tests, provide multiple values to
|
|
|
|
:option:`--test-tags <odoo-bin --test-tags>`: on the command-line, values
|
|
|
|
are *additive* (you're selecting all tests with *any* of the specified tags)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags nice,standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The config switch parameter also accepts the ``+`` and ``-`` prefixes. The
|
|
|
|
``+`` prefix is implied and therefore, totaly optional. The ``-`` (minus)
|
|
|
|
prefix is made to deselect tests tagged with the prefixed tags, even if they
|
|
|
|
are selected by other specified tags e.g. if there are ``standard`` tests which
|
|
|
|
are also tagged as ``slow`` you can run all standard tests *except* the slow
|
|
|
|
ones:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags 'standard,-slow'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you write a test that does not inherit from the
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.BaseCase`, this test will not have the default tags,
|
|
|
|
you have to add them explicitely to have the test included in the default test
|
|
|
|
suite. This is a common issue when using a simple ``unittest.TestCase`` as
|
|
|
|
they're not going to get run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import unittest
|
|
|
|
from odoo.tests import tagged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@tagged('standard', 'at_install')
|
|
|
|
class SmallTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-11 17:57:39 +07:00
|
|
|
.. _reference/testing/tags:
|
|
|
|
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
Special tags
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ``standard``: All Odoo tests that inherit from
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.BaseCase` are implicitely tagged standard.
|
|
|
|
:option:`--test-tags <odoo-bin --test-tags>` also defaults to ``standard``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That means untagged test will be executed by default when tests are enabled.
|
|
|
|
- ``at_install``: Means that the test will be executed right after the module
|
|
|
|
installation and before other modules are installed. This is a default
|
|
|
|
implicit tag.
|
|
|
|
- ``post_install``: Means that the test will be executed after all the modules
|
|
|
|
are installed. This is what you want for HttpCase tests most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this is *not exclusive* with ``at_install``, however since you
|
|
|
|
will generally not want both ``post_install`` is usually paired with
|
|
|
|
``-at_install`` when tagging a test class.
|
|
|
|
- *module_name*: Odoo tests classes extending
|
|
|
|
:class:`~odoo.tests.common.BaseCase` are implicitely tagged with the
|
|
|
|
technical name of their module. This allows easily selecting or excluding
|
|
|
|
specific modules when testing e.g. if you want to only run tests from
|
|
|
|
``stock_account``:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags stock_account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. important::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tests will be executed only in the installed or updated modules. So
|
|
|
|
modules have to be selected with the :option:`-u <odoo-bin -u>` or
|
|
|
|
:option:`-i <odoo-bin -i>` switches. For simplicity, those switches are
|
|
|
|
not specified in the examples below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run only the tests from the sale module:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run the tests from the sale module but not the ones tagged as slow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags 'sale,-slow'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run only the tests from stock or tagged as slow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ odoo-bin --test-enable --test-tags '-standard, slow, stock'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: ``-standard`` is implicit (not required), and present for clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing JS code
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
Testing a complex system is an important safeguard to prevent regressions and to
|
|
|
|
guarantee that some basic functionality still works. Since Odoo has a non trivial
|
|
|
|
codebase in Javascript, it is necessary to test it. In this section, we will
|
|
|
|
discuss the practice of testing JS code in isolation: these tests stay in the
|
|
|
|
browser, and are not supposed to reach the server.
|
|
|
|
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
Qunit test suite
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
The Odoo framework uses the QUnit_ library testing framework as a test runner.
|
|
|
|
QUnit defines the concepts of *tests* and *modules* (a set of related tests),
|
|
|
|
and gives us a web based interface to execute the tests.
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
For example, here is what a pyUtils test could look like:
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.module('py_utils');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.test('simple arithmetic', function (assert) {
|
|
|
|
assert.expect(2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var result = pyUtils.py_eval("1 + 2");
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result, 3, "should properly evaluate sum");
|
|
|
|
result = pyUtils.py_eval("42 % 5");
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result, 2, "should properly evaluate modulo operator");
|
|
|
|
});
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
The main way to run the test suite is to have a running Odoo server, then
|
|
|
|
navigate a web browser to ``/web/tests``. The test suite will then be executed
|
|
|
|
by the web browser Javascript engine.
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. image:: ./images/tests.png
|
|
|
|
:align: center
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
The web UI has many useful features: it can run only some submodules, or
|
|
|
|
filter tests that match a string. It can show every assertions, failed or passed,
|
|
|
|
rerun specific tests, ...
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
While the test suite is running, make sure that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- your browser window is focused,
|
|
|
|
- it is not zoomed in/out. It needs to have exactly 100% zoom level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this is not the case, some tests will fail, without a proper explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a high level overview of the most important parts of the testing
|
|
|
|
infrastructure:
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
- there is an asset bundle named `web.qunit_suite`_. This bundle contains
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
the main code (assets common + assets backend), some libraries, the QUnit test
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
runner and the test bundles listed below.
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
- a bundle named `web.tests_assets`_ includes most of the assets and utils required
|
|
|
|
by the test suite: custom QUnit asserts, test helpers, lazy loaded assets, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- another asset bundle, `web.qunit_suite_tests`_, contains all the test scripts.
|
|
|
|
This is typically where the test files are added to the suite.
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- there is a `controller`_ in web, mapped to the route */web/tests*. This controller
|
|
|
|
simply renders the *web.qunit_suite* template.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- to execute the tests, one can simply point its browser to the route */web/tests*.
|
|
|
|
In that case, the browser will download all assets, and QUnit will take over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- there is some code in `qunit_config.js`_ which logs in the console some
|
|
|
|
information when a test passes or fails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- we want the runbot to also run these tests, so there is a test (in `test_js.py`_)
|
|
|
|
which simply spawns a browser and points it to the *web/tests* url. Note that
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
the browser_js method spawns a Chrome headless instance.
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modularity and testing
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the way Odoo is designed, any addon can modify the behaviour of other parts
|
|
|
|
of the system. For example, the *voip* addon can modify the *FieldPhone* widget
|
|
|
|
to use extra features. This is not really good from the perspective of the
|
|
|
|
testing system, since this means that a test in the addon web will fail whenever
|
|
|
|
the voip addon is installed (note that the runbot runs the tests with all addons
|
|
|
|
installed).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the same time, our testing sytem is good, because it can detect whenever
|
|
|
|
another module breaks some core functionality. There is no complete solution to
|
|
|
|
this issue. For now, we solve this on a case by case basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usually, it is not a good idea to modify some other behaviour. For our voip
|
|
|
|
example, it is certainly cleaner to add a new *FieldVOIPPhone* widget and
|
|
|
|
modify the few views that needs it. This way, the *FieldPhone* widget is not
|
|
|
|
impacted, and both can be tested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding a new test case
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let us assume that we are maintaining an addon *my_addon*, and that we
|
|
|
|
want to add a test for some javascript code (for example, some utility function
|
|
|
|
myFunction, located in *my_addon.utils*). The process to add a new test case is
|
|
|
|
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. create a new file *my_addon/static/tests/utils_tests.js*. This file contains the basic code to
|
|
|
|
add a QUnit module *my_addon > utils*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
odoo.define('my_addon.utils_tests', function (require) {
|
|
|
|
"use strict";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var utils = require('my_addon.utils');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.module('my_addon', {}, function () {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.module('utils');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. In *my_addon/assets.xml*, add the file to the main test assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: xml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
|
|
|
|
<odoo>
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
<template id="qunit_suite_tests" name="my addon tests" inherit_id="web.qunit_suite_tests">
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
<xpath expr="//script[last()]" position="after">
|
|
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/my_addon/static/tests/utils_tests.js"/>
|
|
|
|
</xpath>
|
|
|
|
</template>
|
|
|
|
</odoo>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Restart the server and update *my_addon*, or do it from the interface (to
|
|
|
|
make sure the new test file is loaded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Add a test case after the definition of the *utils* sub test suite:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.test("some test case that we want to test", function (assert) {
|
|
|
|
assert.expect(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var result = utils.myFunction(someArgument);
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result, expectedResult);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Visit */web/tests/* to make sure the test is executed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helper functions and specialized assertions
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without help, it is quite difficult to test some parts of Odoo. In particular,
|
|
|
|
views are tricky, because they communicate with the server and may perform many
|
|
|
|
rpcs, which needs to be mocked. This is why we developed some specialized
|
|
|
|
helper functions, located in `test_utils.js`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Mock test functions: these functions help setting up a test environment. The
|
|
|
|
most important use case is mocking the answers given by the Odoo server. These
|
|
|
|
functions use a `mock server`_. This is a javascript class that simulates
|
|
|
|
answers to the most common model methods: read, search_read, nameget, ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- DOM helpers: useful to simulate events/actions on some specific target. For
|
|
|
|
example, testUtils.dom.click performs a click on a target. Note that it is
|
|
|
|
safer than doing it manually, because it also checks that the target exists,
|
|
|
|
and is visible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- create helpers: they are probably the most important functions exported by
|
|
|
|
`test_utils.js`_. These helpers are useful to create a widget, with a mock
|
|
|
|
environment, and a lot of small detail to simulate as much as possible the
|
|
|
|
real conditions. The most important is certainly `createView`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- `qunit assertions`_: QUnit can be extended with specialized assertions. For
|
|
|
|
Odoo, we frequently test some DOM properties. This is why we made some
|
|
|
|
assertions to help with that. For example, the *containsOnce* assertion takes
|
|
|
|
a widget/jQuery/HtmlElement and a selector, then checks if the target contains
|
|
|
|
exactly one match for the css selector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, with these helpers, here is what a simple form test could look like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUnit.test('simple group rendering', function (assert) {
|
|
|
|
assert.expect(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var form = testUtils.createView({
|
|
|
|
View: FormView,
|
|
|
|
model: 'partner',
|
|
|
|
data: this.data,
|
|
|
|
arch: '<form string="Partners">' +
|
|
|
|
'<group>' +
|
|
|
|
'<field name="foo"/>' +
|
|
|
|
'</group>' +
|
|
|
|
'</form>',
|
|
|
|
res_id: 1,
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.containsOnce(form, 'table.o_inner_group');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
form.destroy();
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice the use of the testUtils.createView helper and of the containsOnce
|
|
|
|
assertion. Also, the form controller was properly destroyed at the end of
|
|
|
|
the test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Practices
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In no particular order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- all test files should be added in *some_addon/static/tests/*
|
|
|
|
- for bug fixes, make sure that the test fails without the bug fix, and passes
|
|
|
|
with it. This ensures that it actually works.
|
|
|
|
- try to have the minimal amount of code necessary for the test to work.
|
|
|
|
- usually, two small tests are better than one large test. A smaller test is
|
|
|
|
easier to understand and to fix.
|
|
|
|
- always cleanup after a test. For example, if your test instantiates a widget,
|
|
|
|
it should destroy it at the end.
|
|
|
|
- no need to have full and complete code coverage. But adding a few tests helps
|
|
|
|
a lot: it makes sure that your code is not completely broken, and whenever a
|
|
|
|
bug is fixed, it is really much easier to add a test to an existing test suite.
|
|
|
|
- if you want to check some negative assertion (for example, that a HtmlElement
|
|
|
|
does not have a specific css class), then try to add the positive assertion in
|
|
|
|
the same test (for example, by doing an action that changes the state). This
|
|
|
|
will help avoid the test to become dead in the future (for example, if the css
|
|
|
|
class is changed).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tips
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- running only one test: you can (temporarily!) change the *QUnit.test(...)*
|
|
|
|
definition into *QUnit.only(...)*. This is useful to make sure that QUnit
|
|
|
|
only runs this specific test.
|
|
|
|
- debug flag: most create utility functions have a debug mode (activated by the
|
|
|
|
debug: true parameter). In that case, the target widget will be put in the DOM
|
|
|
|
instead of the hidden qunit specific fixture, and more information will be
|
|
|
|
logged. For example, all mocked network communications will be available in the
|
|
|
|
console.
|
|
|
|
- when working on a failing test, it is common to add the debug flag, then
|
|
|
|
comment the end of the test (in particular, the destroy call). With this, it
|
|
|
|
is possible to see the state of the widget directly, and even better, to
|
|
|
|
manipulate the widget by clicking/interacting with it.
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration Testing
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Python code and JS code separately is very useful, but it does not prove
|
|
|
|
that the web client and the server work together. In order to do that, we can
|
|
|
|
write another kind of test: tours. A tour is a mini scenario of some interesting
|
|
|
|
business flow. It explains a sequence of steps that should be followed. The
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
test runner will then create a Chrome headless browser, point it to the proper url
|
[REF][MOV] documentation apocalypse
Prior to this commit, the Odoo documentation was mainly split between
two repositories: odoo/odoo/doc and odoo/documentation-user. Some bits
of documentation were also hosted elsewhere (e.g., wiki, upgrade, ...).
This was causing several problems among which:
- The theme, config, Makefile, and similar technical resources had to
be duplicated. This resulted in inconsistent layout, features, and
build environments from one documentation to another.
- Some pages did not fit either documentation as they were relevant
for both users and developers. Some were relevant to neither of the
two (e.g., DB management).
- Cross-doc references had to be absolute links and they broke often.
- Merging large image files in the developer documentation would bloat
the odoo/odoo repository. Some contributions had to be lightened to
avoid merging too many images (e.g., Odoo development tutorials).
- Long-time contributors to the user documentation were chilly about
going through the merging process of the developer documentation
because of the runbot, mergebot, `odoo-dev` repository, etc.
- Some contributors would look for the developer documentation in the
`odoo/documentation-user` repository.
- Community issues about the user documentation were submitted on the
`odoo/odoo` repository and vice-versa.
Merging all documentations in one repository will allow us to have one
place, one theme, one work process, and one set of tools (build
environment, ...) for all of the Odoo docs.
As this is a good opportunity to revamp the layout of the documentation,
a brand new theme replaces the old one. It features a new way to
navigate the documentation, centered on the idea of always letting the
reader know what is the context (enclosing section, child pages, page
structure ...) of the page they are reading. The previous theme would
quickly confuse readers as they navigated the documentation and followed
cross-application links.
The chance is also taken to get rid of all the technical dangling parts,
performance issues, and left-overs. Except for some page-specific JS
scripts, the Odoo theme Sphinx extension is re-written from scratch
based on the latest Sphinx release to benefit from the improvements and
ease future contributions.
task-2351938
task-2352371
task-2205684
task-2352544
Closes #945
2021-04-30 17:40:29 +07:00
|
|
|
and simulate the click and inputs, according to the scenario.
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Screenshots and screencasts during browser_js tests
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When running tests that use HttpCase.browser_js from the command line, the Chrome
|
|
|
|
browser is used in headless mode. By default, if a test fails, a PNG screenshot is
|
|
|
|
taken at the moment of the failure and written in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'/tmp/odoo_tests/{db_name}/screenshots/'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two new command line arguments were added since Odoo 13.0 to control this behavior:
|
|
|
|
:option:`--screenshots <odoo-bin --screenshots>` and :option:`--screencasts <odoo-bin --screencasts>`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
Performance Testing
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Query counts
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the ways to test performance is to measure database queries. Manually, this can be tested with the
|
|
|
|
`--log-sql` CLI parameter. If you want to establish the maximum number of queries for an operation,
|
|
|
|
you can use the :meth:`~odoo.tests.common.BaseCase.assertQueryCount` method, integrated in Odoo test classes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with self.assertQueryCount(11):
|
|
|
|
do_something()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _reference/testing/populate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Database population
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odoo CLI offers a :ref:`database population<reference/cmdline/populate>` feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
odoo-bin populate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of the tedious manual, or programmatic, specification of test data,
|
|
|
|
one can use this feature to fill a database on demand with the desired number of test data.
|
|
|
|
This can be used to detect diverse bugs or performance issues in tested flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _reference/testing/populate/methods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To specify this feature for a given model, the following methods and attributes can be defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. currentmodule:: odoo.models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. autoattribute:: Model._populate_sizes
|
|
|
|
.. autoattribute:: Model._populate_dependencies
|
|
|
|
.. automethod:: Model._populate
|
|
|
|
.. automethod:: Model._populate_factories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have to define at least :meth:`~odoo.models.Model._populate` or :meth:`~odoo.models.Model._populate_factories`
|
|
|
|
on the model to enable database population.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example model
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from odoo.tools import populate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CustomModel(models.Model)
|
|
|
|
_inherit = "custom.some_model"
|
|
|
|
_populate_sizes = {"small": 100, "medium": 2000, "large": 10000}
|
|
|
|
_populate_dependencies = ["custom.some_other_model"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _populate_factories(self):
|
|
|
|
# Record ids of previously populated models are accessible in the registry
|
|
|
|
some_other_ids = self.env.registry.populated_models["custom.some_other_model"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_some_field(values=None, random=None, **kwargs):
|
|
|
|
""" Choose a value for some_field depending on other fields values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:param dict values:
|
|
|
|
:param random: seeded :class:`random.Random` object
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
field_1 = values['field_1']
|
|
|
|
if field_1 in [value2, value3]:
|
|
|
|
return random.choice(some_field_values)
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return [
|
|
|
|
("field_1", populate.randomize([value1, value2, value3])),
|
|
|
|
("field_2", populate.randomize([value_a, value_b], [0.5, 0.5])),
|
|
|
|
("some_other_id", populate.randomize(some_other_ids)),
|
|
|
|
("some_field", populate.compute(get_some_field, seed="some_field")),
|
|
|
|
('active', populate.cartesian([True, False])),
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _populate(self, size):
|
|
|
|
records = super()._populate(size)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If you want to update the generated records
|
|
|
|
# E.g setting the parent-child relationships
|
|
|
|
records.do_something()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return records
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population tools
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple population tools are available to easily create
|
|
|
|
the needed data generators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. automodule:: odoo.tools.populate
|
|
|
|
:members: cartesian, compute, constant, iterate, randint, randomize
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
.. _qunit: https://qunitjs.com/
|
|
|
|
.. _qunit_config.js: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/static/tests/helpers/qunit_config.js#L49
|
2021-05-04 21:51:07 +07:00
|
|
|
.. _web.tests_assets: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/views/webclient_templates.xml#L594
|
|
|
|
.. _web.qunit_suite: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/views/webclient_templates.xml#L660
|
|
|
|
.. _web.qunit_suite_tests: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/views/webclient_templates.xml#L680
|
2021-05-04 21:31:06 +07:00
|
|
|
.. _controller: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/controllers/main.py#L637
|
|
|
|
.. _test_js.py: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/tests/test_js.py#L13
|
|
|
|
.. _test_utils.js: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/static/tests/helpers/test_utils.js
|
|
|
|
.. _mock server: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/static/tests/helpers/mock_server.js
|
|
|
|
.. _qunit assertions: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/static/tests/helpers/qunit_asserts.js
|
|
|
|
.. _createView: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/51ee0c3cb59810449a60dae0b086b49b1ed6f946/addons/web/static/tests/helpers/test_utils_create.js#L267
|